欢迎访问知识产权学术与实务研究网! [请登录], 新用户?[免费注册] 设为首页|添加收藏|联系我们|网站地图|English
当前位置:知识产权学术与实务研究网 > 知识产权论坛 > 专利法论文选登 >  文章

美国商业方法专利的十年扩张与轮回:从道富案到Bilski案的历史考察

来源:《知识产权》2010年第6期  作者: 刘银良  时间:2015-02-05  阅读数:


[13]See USPTO, Automated Financial or Management Data Processing Methods(Business Methods),White Paper Ver. 1. 43,issued in 2000(以下称“USPTO White Paper”),at 6-7. Available at http://.uspto. gov/patents/resources/methods/whitepaper. pdf(本文引用的所有电子文献的最后访问时间都是2010年9月6日,以下不再一一注明).《国际专利分类表》第八版(International Patent Classification, 8th edition, 2006年初生效)为商业方法专利创设的分类类别为“G06F17/60”。
[14]See Edmund Burke Commisioner of Patents, List of Patents for Inventions and Designs, issued by the United States from 1790 to 1847。转引自USPTO White Paper, at 2-3.
[15]See Hotel Security Checking Co v.Lorraine Co.,160 F.467 (2d Cir. 1908).
[16]Joseph E. Seagram & Sons v. Marzell, 180 F. 2d 26, at 28(D. C. Cir. 1950).
[17]See Giles S. Rich, The Principles of Patentability, 14 Fed. Cir. B. J. 135 (reprinted from 28 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 393,1960),at 135-136.
[18]See In re Chakrabarty, 571 F. 2d 40(CCPA 1978);In re Diehr, 602 F. 2d 982(CCPA 1979)
[19]See In re Bilski, 545 F. 3d 943,at 959-960(Fed. Cir. 2008).
[20]See Arrhythmia Research Technology Inc.vCorazonix Corp.,958 F. 2d 1053(Fed. Cir. 1992).
[21]See In re Alappat, 33 F. 3d 1526(Fed. Cir. 1994)
[22]See State Stree Bank & Trust Co.v.Signature Financial Group, Inc.,149 F. 3d 1368,at 1373(Fed. Cir. 1998).
[23]State Stree Bank&Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.,149 F. 3d 1368,at 1375(Fed. Cir. 1998).
[24]See Stree Bank&Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.,525 U. S. 1093(1999).
[25]See AT&T Corporation v. Excel Communications, Inc.,172 F. 3d 1352(Fed. Cir. 1999).
[26]John R. Thomas, The Patenting of the Liberal Professions, 40 B.C.L.Rev.1139,1160(1999).转引自In re Bilski, 545 F. 3d 943(Mayer, J.,dissenting).
[27]William Krause, Sweeping the E-Commerce Patent Minefield: The Need for a Workable Business Method Exception, 24 Seattle U. L. Rev. 79, 101 (2000).转引自In re Bilski, 545 F. 3d 943 ( Mayer, J. , dissenting).
[28]See Bilski v. Kappos, 130 S. Ct. 3218,at 3248 (2010)(Stevens, J.,concurring).
[29]In re Bilski, 545 F. 3d 943,at 1004(2008)(Mayer, J., dissenting).
[30]See 35 U. S. C. 273 (a) (3).
[31]See USPTO, Patenting In Technology Classes-Count of 1963-2008 Utility Patent Grants(Class 705),at http://www.uspto. gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/tecstca/705clstc_ gd. htm.
[32]See USPTO White Paper-Automated Business Methods-Section III Class 705. At http: //www. uspto. gov/patents/resources/methods/afmdpm/class705. jsp
[33]See MPEP§706. 03(a)(1994).
[34]See Ex Parte Lundgren, Appeal No. 2003-2088 (BPAI 2005).
[35]See European Patent Convention, Article 52(1).
[36]需要说明,本文以下主要分析的数据是USPTO专门对于第705类专利进行检索得到的结果。如果运用“交互参照” (cross-inference)方法加以补充,相应的专利还会大幅增加。See USPTO-Patent Technology Monitoring Team (PTMT) , Patent Counts By Class By Year, Table Al-1 and Table Al-2, at http: //www. uspto. gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/cbcby. htm.
[37]在1997年第705类创立之前,相关专利基本处于第395类和第364类(这两个分类早期分别是从第235类分离出来)。See USPTO White Paper-Automated Business Methods-Section III Class 705.
[38]See USPTO, Patenting In Technology Classes, Count of 1963-2008 Utility Patent Grants(Class 705),at http: //www. uspto. gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/tecstea/705clstc_gd.htm;Count of 2005-2009 Utility Patent Grants(Class 705),at http://www.uspto. gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/teeste/705clstc-gd.htm.
[39]See USPTO, Patenting In Technology Classes-Count of 1963-2008 Utility Patent Grants(Class 705).
[40]USPTO White Paper, at 9.
[41]Douglas L. Price, Assessing the Patentability of Financial Services and Products, 3 J. High Tech. L. 141 , at 153, 155.转引自In re Bilski, 545 F. 3d 943,at 1004-1005 (Mayer, J.,dissenting)
[42]See, e. g.,In re Bilski, 545 F. 3d 943,at 1004-1005 (Mayer, J.,dissenting)
[43]In re Bilski, 545 F. 3d 943,at 1004(Mayer, J.,dissenting)
[44]See USPTO White Paper, at 12-22.
[45]See USPTO, FY 2009 USPTO Performance and Accountability Report, 3. 2. 2,at http://www.uspto. gov/web/offices/com/annual/2009/mda 02 02. html.
[46]See Robert M. Hunt, Business Method Patents and U. S. Financial Services, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Working Paper No. 08-10/R, February 2009,at 3,available at http: //www. philadelphiafed. org/research-and-data/publications/workingpapers/; USPTO,FY 2007 USPTO Performance and Accountability Report, 3. 2. 2, at http: //www. uspto. gov/web/offices/com/annual/2007/30202_sglperfrm. html.
[47]USPTO, Class 705 Application Filing and Patents Issued Data, at http: //www. uspto. gov/patents/resources/methods/applicationtil-ing. jsp.注意此处USPTO的统计数据与上述表1中的一些统计数据不符,但相差较小,并不影响相关结论。
[48]See Robert M. Hunt, supra note 46, at 5.
[49]See Robert M. Hunt, supra note 46,at 6-9.
[50]See Josh Lerner,“ The Litigation of Financial Innovations” , NBER Working Paper No. 14324, 2008.转引自Robert M. Hunt, supra note 46,at 15-16.
[51]See Robert M. Hunt, supra note 46, at 17-18.
[52]See Brenner v.Manson, 383 U. S. 519, at 529(1966).
[53]ee James Bessen and Michael J. Meurer, Patent Failure : How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk, 2008,Prin-ceton: Princeton University Press转引自Robert M. Hunt, supra note 46 , at 28.
[54]See Robert M. Hunt, supra note 46, at 28-29.
[55]See Amazon. com v. Barnesandnoble. com, 239 F. 3d 1343(Fed. Cir. 2001).
[56]GNU, Why we boycott Amazon, at http: //www. gnu. org/philosophy/amazon. html.
[57]See Jeff Bezos, Bezos and O’Reilly Spearhead Call for Patent Reform-An open letter from Jeff Bezos on the subject of patents, published on March 9, 2000, at http: //oreilly. com/news/amazon_ patents. html.
[58]See Larry Downes, Supreme Court hedges on business method patents, at http: //news. cnet. com/8301-13578_3-20009046-38. html.
[59]See In re Bilski, 545 F. 3d 943,at 949-950 (Fed. Cir. 2008).
[60]See In re Freeman, 573 F. 2d 1237(CCPA 1978);In re Walter, 618 F. 2d 758(CCPA 1980);In re Abele, 684 F. 2d 902(CCPA1982).
[61]See In re Bilski, 545 F. 3d 943,at 961- 962 (Fed. Cir. 2008).
[62]See In re Bilski, 545 F. 3d 943,at 963-964 (Fed. Cir. 2008).
[63]See In re Bilski, 545 F. 3d 943,at 960 (Fed. Cir. 2008).
[64]In re Bilski, 545 F. 3d 943,at 998 (Mayer, J.,dissenting).
[65]See USPTO, Guidance for Examining Process Claims in view of In re Bilski, signed on January 7,2009, at http://www.uspto. gov/web/offices/pac/dapp/opla/documents/bilski_ guidance_ memo. pdf.
[66]See eBay v.MercExchange, 547 U. S. 388, at 397 (2006) (Kennedy, J.,dissenting).
[67]See Lab. Corp. of Am. Holdings v.Metabolite Labs.,Inc.,548 U. S. 124, at 136-137(Breyer, J., dissenting).
[68]See Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U. S. 175,at 182 (1981);BilskivKappos, 130 S. Ct. 3218,at 3225-3226 (2010).
[69]依据该规则,对于含义模糊的概念,可从与之联系的相邻词语中寻求更为准确的解释。See United States v.Stevens, 130S. Ct. 1577,at 1588 (2010);BilskivKappos, 130 S. Ct. 3218,at 3226 (2010).
[70]35 U. S. C. § 100 (b).
[71]See BilskivKappos, 130 S. Ct. 3219, at 3225-3226 (2010).
[72]See Corleyv·United States, 129 S. Ct. 1558,at 1566-1567(2009);BilskivKappos, 130 S. Ct. 3218,at 3228-3229 (2010).
[73]Bilskiv.Kappos, 130 S. Ct. 3218,at 3231 (2010).
[74]BilskivKappos, 130 S. Ct. 3218,at 3257 (2010)(Stevens, J.,concurring).
[75]See Peter Whoriskey, “High court relaxes limits on patents; But it rejects a claim for a business method”,The Washington Post, June29, 2010, at A07.
[76]John Schwartz, “Broad View Of Patents On Methods”,The New York Times, June 29, 2010, at 1.
[77]Steve Lohr, “Ruling leaves patent law unclear”,The International Herald Tribune, June 30, 2010, at 19.
[78]ibid.
[79]See John Schwartz, supra note 76; Steve Lohr, supra note 77.
[80]See Bilski v. Kappos,130 S. Ct. 3218, at 3227-3228 (2010).
[81]See Bilski v.Kappos, 130 S. Ct. 3218, at 3228(2010).
[82]Bilskiv.Kappos, 130 S. Ct. 3218,at 3249-3250, 3257 (2010)(Stevens, J.,concurring).
[83]European Patent Convention, Articles 52 (1),52 (2)-(3).
[84]See, e. g.,EPO 0931/95 (2000);Guidelines for Examination in the European Patent Office (2010),Part C,Chapter IV-I,1.2(ii);Chapter IV-4, 2.3.5.
[85]See UK Patent Act (19T7, amended 2007),Section 1 (2)(c).
[86]参见我国《专利法》(2008年修订)第二条第二款、第二十五条第一款第(二)项;《专利审查指南》(2010)第二部分第一章第4.2节、第二部分第九章第2节。
共3页: 上一页 1 2 3 下一页
相关文章
中国专利法的发展道路:现代化、国际化与战略化
突发公共卫生危机与药品专利强制许可
从最高人民法院第20号指导案例看发明专利的临时保护制度
美国专利审查中的“最宽合理解释”
“特意排除”规则:限制等同原则适用的一种新规则
网站创始人
个人简介:(学术)
中国政法大学教授、博士生导师
知识产权法研究所所长、无形资产管理研究中心主任
北京大学法学博士
中国人民大学法学博士后
邮箱:fengxiaoqingipr@sina.com
北京市海淀区西土城路25号中国政法大学知识产权法研究所
个人简介:(实务)
最高法院案例指导工作专家委员会委员
最高法院知识产权司法保护研究中心首届研究员
中欧仲裁中心仲裁员
深圳、南京仲裁委员会仲裁员
北京天驰君泰律师事务所律师
中国律协知识产权专业委员会委员
中国审判研究会知识产权审判理论专业委员会委员
热点文章排行
联系我们更多>>
通讯处:(Zip:100088)
地址:北京市海淀区西土城路25号中国政法大学知识产权法研究所(Zip:100088)
点击进入免费咨询>>

All rights reserved  备ICP证号:京ICP备12039890号-3 公安备案号:京公网安备:11011402010413号

地址:北京市海淀区西土城路25号中国政法大学知识产权法研究所(Zip:100088)

技术支持:律师营销网  您是网站第位访客